Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Bush Worse Than Hitler: The Proof

Yesterday, I inadvertently confused the Democratic Party’s “Take Back America” program with the “25 Points of Hitler’s Nazi Party”.

But upon reading the Nazi platform, it occurred to me that Hitler was more progressive than Bush! Just look at these excerpts from the Nazis:

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood.

9. All citizens must possess equal rights and duties.

10. The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically. No individual shall do any work that offends against the interest of the community to the benefit of all.

12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.

15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.

21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.

Come to think of it, Hitler was more progressive than today’s weak-spined Democrats. Read this, Nancy Pelosi:

18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.

Say what you will about Hitler, this is incontrovertible proof that Amerikkka would be better off with a leader like Hitler instead of an extreme right-wing fascist like Bush.


ForceTube Avenue said...


Hitler was more progressive than the evil "W" in yet another way. He was anti-WalMart!

See point 16 -

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate **communalization of large stores** which will be rented cheaply to **small tradespeople**, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.

No "bix box" monstrosties in National Socialism! No sprawl! Only "mom-and-pop" stores will supply both individuals and government.

The Democrats should have such courage!

shlemazl said...

This makes it clear now. I was wondering why Bob Rae, who is the Liberal Party leadership candidate, compared a recent softwood lumber deal between Canada and the US to the Munich Pact.

Now I can see that he was totally justified.

Palestine Blogs - The Gazette Subscribe in Bloglines