Sunday, April 30, 2006

Darfur: Help the People of Color!

It's clear that the United States must immediately intervene to stop the genocide in Darfur. Out of Iraq, out of Iran, and into Darfur.

Why? Because it is our opportunity to save the world's oppressed without any benefit to the piggish louts who live in America.

Similarly, I was very much in favor of President William Clinton bypassing Congress and of course bypassing the United Nations when he launched a bombing capaign on Serbia in order to "make the world safer for the 21st century."

(Well, at least the world was made safer until chimpanzee Bush made it dangerous again.)

Fact is, I was very concerned about the oppressed Bosnians, even if they do appear to be white. But most of all, Amerika really had little to gain by this bombing. This is altruism in the best sense, and it is why we did not stage any protests.

Remember: In all interventions, we must never gain, and we must always protect people of color. From Rwanda to South Africa to Palestine, we must be vigilant.

We are their patrons, and we must protect them.

I think I'll greet a black person on my way home today; they like it when we do that!

Saturday, April 29, 2006

Democrat Door-Knocking Event Today!


Today is Neighbor-to-Neighbor National Organizing Day; we’ll be canvassing the entire country, knocking on people’s doors! And once we’re in their homes, we’ll convert them to our side!

Read the words of Governor Howard Dean:

“Thousands of volunteers will recruit hundreds of thousands more Americans committed to changing the status quo this year during door-knocking events in communities across America.”

Want to know what will be going on in your community? Go here and pick an event!

Me, I’m going to start early – maybe 4AM. And I’m going to push my way in and not leave until I am spinning with success.

Here are some tips for persuading ignorant people to join us:

A) Be sure to raise your voice; screaming and emoting will reveal your human side.

B) Repeat the same points over and over again; it’s like hammering a nail into a wall.

C) Don’t let them get a word in! You’re there to speak to them!

D) Point out any deficiencies in their house like the presence of labor-saving devices that replace union labor – dish washers, washing machines, electricity, etc.

E) If you are hungry, raid the fridge! It will show them that we are all about sharing.

F) Emphasize your academic background.

G) Demand to see five years worth of tax returns.

H) Remember diversity: If you see any children, boast how you’re a NAMBLA member – it’s your First Amendment right!

I) Demand lots of money; organizing isn’t cheap!

Also, remember to slap large non-removable stickers on their car when you leave. “Human Extinction NOW” is a good choice. Or maybe, “Driving this Car Pays for the Zionist Enemy.” And there’s always, “Fuck You and Fuck Your Hummer”.

Friday, April 28, 2006

The Ten Most Harmful Government Programs

I’ve noticed that some enemy blogs have been listing their “ten most harmful government programs”.

OK, I’ll bite!

Here’s my list:

1) The Second Amendment

I’ll get back to you later, perhaps, with others.

But speaking of things that should be outlawed, a very good case can be made that televisions are very dangerous – let’s ban them, too!

Thursday, April 27, 2006

The Christians are After Me

This was to be expected, I suppose, for my post on why I hate Christians.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Garfield on Oil Prices

I have to confess...sometimes the comic strip "Garfield" is funny...and educational!

Did you see today's strip where they discuss oil prices?






Gas Prices: Too High or Not High Enough?

The short answer is "both". That is:


- Gas prices are too high because Big Oil is getting rich, and

- Gas prices are too low because people are still buying gas.

Lets look a little closer at this.

Reasons for high gas prices:

A) According to the estemed U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, gas prices do not follow the laws of supply and demand:

"The oil companies are just raising the prices up and up and up. The question is are they doing this based on the laws of supply and demand or is something else at work," Schumer told reporters over the din of city traffic at a press conference in front of a Manhattan gasoline service station."

B) Of course, there is "something else at work". For starters, how about Dick Cheney's Oil Wars? Blood for oil, and oil for money to line the pockets of Cheney and his fat-cat friends. Have you read Dreaming War by Gore Vidal? I haven't had the time to look at it, but I highly recommend it. The description is luscious:

"And just as Pearl Harbor got America into World War II, Cheney and Bush gleefully used 9/11 to begin a long war against enemies who just so happen to live amidst the oil reserves coveted by our executive branch (themselves former oil barons)."

C) According to U.S. Senator Richard Durbin, prices are high because oil companies are greedy:

“American consumers are paying the price for an energy policy that rewards the greed of oil and gas companies..."

But U.S. Senator Bob Menendez really got it right:

"It's crystal clear that the current spike in gas prices is at least partly due to an act of greed, greed that has been enabled, abetted — even encouraged, I would say — by this administration."

Recently, a student questioned this reason, noting that this implies that oil companies were not greedy in the past; his attack on progressive economics earned him an "F". Look, people, this is gouging and profiteering! Have you not considered that true progressives never make profits?

Anyway, look at the sharp wit of Senator Durbin! Forgive me for chuckling while so many suffer, but this man is outrageously funny with his word play:

“Oil companies are living in the fast lane and consumers are being left on the side of the road,” Durbin said. “How many more billions of dollars in outrageous profits will oil and gas companies continue to make before Congress finally steps in to protect consumers and businesses hit hard by the skyrocketing costs.”

Here's why gas prices ought to be even higher:

A) Filthy fat Amerikans are still driving! They have not switched to bicycling, walking, and other eco-friendly forms of transportation .

B) Gas prices are higher in Europe, and Europe is far more progressive than Amerika.

C) Low gas prices leave too much money in private hands. Given all the public needs, it is unacceptable for people to retain such private wealth.

The Solution:

- 1000% gas taxes; $30 per gallon is only fair.

- 100% taxation of all oil profits.

- A progressive and benevolent government takeover of the oil industry.

- One car maximum per household, with its purchase price subject to a 100% Federal environmental tax to supplement UAW retirement benefits.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Why I Hate Christians

First, let me point out that some Christians have their good points, and are brave people. (See here and here.)

But by and large, we are talking about theological imperialism. In their insane bipolar subservience to The Pope and fascist Bush, Christians are slaves to their own narrow dogma -- and are actively attempting to pollute the entire world with their poison.

You see, what matters to them is their perverse personality-cult hate-filled doctrine, which is the very antithesis of our human-based Revolution. Christians are closed-minded, doctrinaire, and are guided by an obscene faith -- the complete opposite of, say, me.

The table below shows how different I am from a typical Christian:

We can only dream of a world without Christians...

Monday, April 24, 2006

Higher Education: NOTHING is More Important

According to government statistics, there are more college graduates than ever before in the U.S. – meaning, of course, that people are therefore becoming more educated –- and intelligent -- than ever.


But first, some background. While only 15% of the population over 65 have a Bachelors Degree or higher (i.e., the dumb generation), 28% of those aged 25 to 34 (i.e., the intelligent generation) have that level of education.

(Incidentally, only 1% of the population holds a doctorate; the percentage with three doctorates is too small for a normal mind to comprehend.)

Now, some people claim that this increase in college graduates is a result of an accelerated evolution of the human mind. Although I respect such views, I will leave such speculation to the experts in aphoristic existentialistic nomicism. Far more likely, it reflects the desirability of students to postpone their fate of capitalist slavery in exchange for a few years of enlightenment from insightful professors. And, of course, we also know that one's chances of success in life are determined exclusively by the reputation of their university.

And that is why it is so disturbing to see "studies" (such as this -- just absolute garbage) which fraudulently claim that attending elite colleges does not result in higher earnings.


Going to an academically elite college does not necessarily boost your earnings potential compared to a less elite college, according to a study by Princeton University economist Alan Krueger. In his paper "Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College," published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, a school's selectivity, as measured by matriculants' average SAT scores, does not correlate with students' later income, once the abilities of the students upon entering college are taken into account....The researchers not only looked at the schools that students attended but also where they were accepted and rejected. They found that where a student applies is a more powerful predictor of future earnings success than where he or she attends.

First of all, as a distinguished professor at a quality university, I am offended by this assertion. So offended, in fact, that I might sue for libel. But legalisms aside, even the dimmest fascists who spread these lies must realize the axiomatic cause-and-effect between superior instruction and an outcome of superior graduates.

Put another way, you are your university. A person can only be defined by where they went to school, where they teach, and the number of degrees they hold. And given those facts (especially the last one), it is therefore plainly evident that my expertise in this area cannot be debated. My lawyers are at the ready.

Sunday, April 23, 2006

A Comic for Children

Although my expertise (among other things) is in teaching advanced insights to highly educated pupils, I will now share a comic that you can show to your children. Their malleable young minds need to be formed, and mixing education and entertainment can do the job.

This is cleverly titled “Comrade and Che” -- a synopsis of thought that will lead to social justice.

The dialogue is real, but presented in a way that children can understand, enjoy, and repeat.

Saturday, April 22, 2006

Millions and Millions of Immigrants: Part 2

The other day, I posed the question: If urban overdevelopment, suburban sprawl, and rural destruction are off limits, then where shall the millions of Mexican immigrants live? (Given, of course, that we welcome them.)


The answer, in the comment section, from "Juan", was:

I propose that we let the immigrants into our homes. This would solve many problems. Or better yet, the government could become the owner of all homes and assign homes based on need and circumstance!


This is nothing short of stupendously brilliant, though I do not know why Juan has suppressed his multiple academic credentials.

Regardless, it is a perfect scenario. As it is, we waste far too much energy with only one family per apartment -- to say nothing of one family for an entire house! It is the residential equivalent of driving a Hummer; i.e., a lifestyle that we cannot afford, nor have any right to have.

By my reckoning, we could easily have one family per room. Therefore, if the typical apartment has two bedrooms, a living room, a kitchen and a bathroom, then we can easily accommodate five families in there. That would allow a five-fold increase in population, or 1,200,000,000 immigrants -- preferably from Latin America, Africa, and The Middle East (Zionists, of course, need not apply) without any new housing development.

In fact, with a little academic ingenuity and the correct policy prescriptions, it would be no trouble to accommodate the entire world's population in Amerika (but without Zionists).

How to do it? Simple. Eliminate all customs controls and border checks. (People working in these positions will be granted early retirement at full pay.) No passports, no visas, no stories. Who can object? Even many right-wing fascists agree that immigration is a positive thing. For that matter, even moron Bush knows that there should be no such thing as an "illegal alien".

And once the entire world's population is living here (with some exceptions, as noted above), our imminent national health care will become global health care! Our Federal taxes will become global taxes! Our revolution will be a Global Revolution! And the reprehensible Amerikan population will finally, FINALLY, be forced to give back what they took from the world -- because everyone will be living within the same national borders.

Of course, until that day comes, we still need to pay for the world outside our borders -- they deserve it and we do not. Think: If we owe money to people within our borders, then by what standard can we reject it to those who are outside our borders?

Palestine Blogs - The Gazette Subscribe in Bloglines